Comments on: Whence Cometh These Prophets http://www.abengnews.com/2010/01/06/whence-cometh-these-prophets/ Caribbean features, views and analysis Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:59:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: JOHN ANTHONY http://www.abengnews.com/2010/01/06/whence-cometh-these-prophets/comment-page-1/#comment-543 JOHN ANTHONY Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:17:50 +0000 http://www.abengnews.com/?p=2098#comment-543 Which is worse? Publishing the predictions of prophets or publishing a long dissertation on another subject called "Evolution For Beginnerss" when there is no scientific evidence that man has evolved from any apes or rock soups? And when the writer fails to answer direct questions on his article he is not directed to answer but allowed to run away claiming questions are not scientific? Lofters should be directed to provide evidence that the Evolution of Man from Apes or Rock soups is repeatable, as the Scientific Protocol mandates, or submit a disclaimer stating that no where has it been documented that man has been observed in a state of evolution from rock soup or Apes to man or declare his belief to be a religious view. Double standard? Of course, of course. Will it be addressed? I am not holding my breath. Publishing Lofters piece was a far worse violation of any related standard tthan hat of the Gleaner publishing prophetic prediction. Which is worse? Publishing the predictions of prophets or publishing a long dissertation on another subject called “Evolution For Beginnerss” when there is no scientific evidence that man has evolved from any apes or rock soups? And when the writer fails to answer direct questions on his article he is not directed to answer but allowed to run away claiming questions are not scientific? Lofters should be directed to provide evidence that the Evolution of Man from Apes or Rock soups is repeatable, as the Scientific Protocol mandates, or submit a disclaimer stating that no where has it been documented that man has been observed in a state of evolution from rock soup or Apes to man or declare his belief to be a religious view. Double standard? Of course, of course. Will it be addressed? I am not holding my breath.

Publishing Lofters piece was a far worse violation of any related standard tthan hat of the Gleaner publishing prophetic prediction.

]]>